Most waterfront development projects today deal with reclaiming prime land for recreational purposes or as a city-wide resource from their prior industrial uses that have often become defunct. As a result, in addition to losing their primary function, the faces of such port cities (seafronts) also face challenges that you mention in the name of encroachment, market pressures, future sustainability, comprehensive planning, development and design in general.
I agree with Shiraz, that in a city like Mumbai, the "people's place" is selective to certain classes first in its development (as in where the money is coming from) and then obviously in terms of returns (the classes it is catering to so its use!) When you look at most case studies, (London, NYC, Boston, Mumbai, Karachi etc.) you will find appropriate gentrification in the name of "the gateway to the city" or "grand sea-front development" etc. Other projects like the Toronto Portlands relied on getting the Olympic commission (which was unsuccessful) to redevelop industrial waterfront areas. Closer to home, New Delhi is tying in the Yamuna redevelopment scheme to the upcoming Commonwealth games in 2010. My point is that these are huge projects and their realization into "successful" places may not be as utopian as we would like them to be. Highest and best use seems to define success in most cases. Also, part of the problem in realizing the project in cities specifically in India is ownership, which is so fragmented. This makes reclaimation very difficult for grand vision projects. Encroachment and informal uses that have mushroomed over time further complicate the problem.
Mixed use is probably the best approach -- you should look at different examples of how you can integrate a variety of uses to sustain a vibrant community. Investment in real estate is most likely going to be high income but uses may be may be programmed to cater to all income groups. You also need to define "people's place" a bit more. Take the Worli seaface in Mumbai for example -- it abuts a fairly affluent, mostly residential community but many people use the space in the evenings and the mornings. It could be a lot better but it would be fair to say that it is a people's place. If I live in Andheri, I wouldn't come to Worli to enjoy that space. My point being, that you need to also define the scope and catchment area of redevelopment -- who is the client? The neighborhood, the district or the city itself. This will inform the gamut of your programmatic guidelines to approach the problem.
- Breen, Anne and Dick Rigby, 1996. The New Waterfront: A Worldwide Urban Success Story, New York: McGraw Hill, 224 pp., 363 illustrations, US $79.95. (h/b)
Breen, A. and D. Rigby, 19-94. Urban Waterfronts: Cities Reclaim Their Edge, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bruttomesso, R. 1995 Cities on Water and Transport, Venice: International Centre Cities on Water, 1995, 220 pp. + ill., C$ 99.50
Bruttomesso, R. 1993. Waterfronts: A New Frontier For Cities On Water, Venice: International Centre Cities on Water. Edwards, B. 1992. London Docklands: Urban Design in an Age of Deregulation, Oxford UK: Butterworth Architecture.
Gordon, David L. A. 1997. Battery Park City: Politics and Planning on the New York Waterfront, New York: Gordon and Breach,. 155 pp. 40 111.
Hoyle, B. S., Cityports, Coastal Zones and Regional Change: International Perspectives on Planning and Management, Brian Hoyle (ed.) Chichester UK: Wiley, 1996, xvi + 316 pp, ill., 45.00 pounds (h/b)
Hoyle, B. S., D.A. Pinder and M.S. Husain 1988. Revitalising the Waterfront International Dimensions of Dockland Development. London: Bellhaven.
- Gordon, David L. A. "Financing Urban Waterfront Redevelopment." Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 244-265, Spring 1997 (R)
Gordon, David L. A. "Managing The Changing Political Environment In Urban Waterfront Redevelopment." Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 61-83, January 1997, (R)
Gordon, David L. A. "Planning, Design and Managing Change in Urban Waterfront Redevelopment." Town Planning Review (UK), Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 261-290. July 1996.
Gordon, David L. A. "Architecture: How Not to Build a City -Implementation at Battery Park City." Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 35 -54. November 1993.
Hall, P. 199 1. "Waterfronts: A New Urban Frontier." University of California Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley CA. Working Paper 538. May 1991.
Hebbert, M. 1992. "One "Planning Disaster" After Another: London Docklands 1970-1992." The London Journal, 17:2, Fall 1992, pp. 115 -13 4.
There is a wave of riverfront developments in India. UP governments ambitious project Gomti riverfront development in Lucknow is under construction which is influenced from first riverfront development project, Gujarat’s Sabarmati Riverfront development. There are several other similar riverfronts proposed on the banks of rivers in India.
Bulky Riverfront Projects
Riverfront developments are cost rich projects that take few years of rigorous work for development. It takes diversion of resources, government budget, labor, etc.
Looking briefly at these projects indicates that the discourse mainly revolves around the commercial and recreational activities. Concrete Wall Embankments, reclamation of the river in floodplains and commercialization of the reclaimed land are the innate components of these projects.
Recreational Activities that are promoted on the riverfronts typically include shopping malls, boat trips, theme parks, restaurants, walk ways and parking lots in the paved and encroached river bed. Every riverfront project talks about the c ommercial beautification of the river but none emphasizes on the betterment of its condition and ecology.
So, what exactly is a riverfront development? What does it entails? Is it just a cosmetic beautification of rivers or does it really rejuvenates or betters the condition of rivers? The riverfront developments that mainly aims to beautify for commercial purposes essentially changes the ecological and social landscapes of the river, transforming it into an urban commercial space rather than a natural, social, cultural, ecological landscape.
Is it wise to go for this kind of development on riverfronts? What does it do to the river ecosystem, its hydrological cycle? What does it do to the downstream of river? These questions need to be explored and answered before accepting the current model of riverfront development as replicable and laudable.
To analyze the present pattern we would take you through different riverfront development projects in the country. Read Below:-
Sabarmati Riverfront development:
Sabarmati riverfront development was the first project in the group of riverfront projects in India. Sabarmati riverfront on river Sabarmati in Ahmedabad was proposed in 1960 but the construction started in year 2005.
It is acclaimed pioneering in urban transformation and envisaged to develop 11.25 Km stretch on the banks of the river but ground reality is different and the project has done little to no development of the river. Instead has deteriorated the river ecology.
The 11.25 km long stretch is made of concrete embankments on both sides with walkways. The estimated cost of the project is Rs.1200 crores which will be recovered by selling of parts of reclaimed land for commercial and residential purpose. The reclaimed land is used for public as well as private development. More than 85% of the reclaimed land will be used for public infrastructure, recreational parks, sports facilities and gardens while nearly 14% will be used for commercial and residential purpose.
In 2003, the project was extended to cover an 11.25 km stretch from 10.4 km stretch with reclamation of 202.79 hectares (501.1 acres) and was put on fast track. Project was inaugurated by then Chief minister of the state Narendra modi on 15 August 2012.
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) claims that the after the project, riverfront has added vibrancy to the urban landscape of Ahmedabad with its well-designed gardens, open spaces, walkways, along with activities which contribute to economic growth.
The average width of the river channel was 382 meters (1,253ft.) and the narrowest cross-section 330 meters (1,080 ft.). It is uniformly narrowed to 263 meters (863 ft.) without affecting its flood carrying capacity and the riverbed land is reclaimed on the both east and west banks to construct 11.25 km long riverfront. The total of 202.79 hectares of land is reclaimed.
It also claims that it improves/has improved environment by reducing erosion of the banks and flooding of low-lying areas of the city by the walls constructed on the both banks. The new integrated sewage and storm-water system intercepts 38 former sewage and industrial effluent discharge points and route it to sewage treatment plants located south of Vasna Barrage. Thus reducing the water pollution in the river. The water level in the river is retained through Vasna Barrage and the losing water is replenished by the Narmada Canal. It enabled the groundwater recharge and the recreational facilities like boating in the river. It also replenishes river by treated sewage water.
But REALITY seems different.
It doesn’t look true. Though the project has been labeled as “best practice” by several financing institutions, it has also drawn flak for poor rehabilitation of the displaced(rehabilitation happened only after High Court orders following a public interest petition) disrupting the nexus of shelter, livelihood and services of urban poor, lack of transparency in the execution, not improving the water quality and for tampering with the carrying capacity of the river.
It is strange that Environment Impact Assessment of the project was not conducted neither any credible public consultation process held.
In the name of Sabarmati River front development, no cleaning of the river has happened. The project has only transferred the water from both banks to the river downstream from Vasna barrage, which is situated downstream from the city. The Vasna barrage stops and stores the water released from Narmada Main Canal that crosses the river about 10.4 km upstream from the barrage. Thus this 11.25 km stretch of the river now holds the Narmada water and huge losses from the stretch are losses for the drought prone areas.
The project was stalled during August 2006 to March 2007 due to heavy floods. Prior to the floods, the river’s maximum carrying capacity was calculated at 4.75 lakh cusecs on basis of the rainfall over last 100 years. The floods however proved the calculation wrong.
The irony is, this project is considered pioneering project in the group of upcoming riverfronts in India and is laying the guide lines for them despite being no less than a failure.
Sabarmati riverfront has distorted the ecology of the river to space the commercial greed of few.
The water quality of the river is extremely poor and has declined in discourse. The cosmetic treatment of the water stretch has depleted the water and Sabarmati and water in the river is of river Narmada.
Components of Sabarmati Riverfront development Project:
- The 11.25 km long stretch would be made of concrete embankments on both sides with walkways.
- The estimated cost of the project is Rs.1200 crores which will be recovered by selling of parts of reclaimed land for commercial and residential purpose.
- The average width of the river channel was 382 meters (1,253 ft.) and now it is further narrowed and jacketed within 263 meters (863 ft.)
- The riverfront with its open spaces, walkways, well-designed gardens along with activities will contribute to economic growth.
- It claims that it improves environment by reducing erosion of the banks and flooding of low-lying areas of the city by the walls constructed on the both banks.
- The water level in the river is retained through Vasna Barrage and the losing water is replenished by the Narmada Canal.
- The shelter, livelihood and services of urban poor were disrupted and displaced poorly to reclaim the river land.
Gomti Riverfront Development
Gomti riverfront is an example of a wrong lead produced by River Sabarmati. Gomti Riverfront started in 2012 under the aspiring government led by then newly elected chief minister Akhilesh yadav. Gomti riverfront was proposed to rejuvenate the present condition of the river Gomti. In addition to it, it would beautify the embankments, to build them for commercial and recreational activities.
The project aims at building concrete riverbanks of length 12 km stretching from Pucca pull to Shaheed path. The state government has made irrigation department the nodal agency of the project to revive the river in three ways. There will be extensive cleaning of the river bed and water flow will be regularized through river channelization. Besides, the surroundings will be made beautiful. There will be walking plazas, cycling and jogging tracks and ghats along the banks. It also aims at joining sharda canal with the river to maintain the water level in the times of crisis.
If look closely, this projects mainly speaks about the cosmetic beautification of the river. Building of concrete walls in the riverbeds has disturbed the ecology of the river. Maximum natural water sources in the depth have depleted and the water has dried up.
In the Environment impact assessment report conduct by IIT Roorkee, IIT Roorkee had warned about the consequences of this project. Limiting the river within the channel of 250 meter wide concrete wall would suffocate the river and advert times would blow away the bridges like Pucca Pull (Hardinge Bridge) with it. When floodplains are paved with the concrete and cement, excess water would flood the city in times of flood.
The project has raised several concerns and received flak from various environment experts all-around. Several drains are still falling un-intercepted in the river causing pollution. Excess tax payers’ money is being wasted on this venture but nothing about the expenses is there in the public domain. People are totally unaware about their money being wasted. Irrigation department denied rendering information asked by Ballotboxindia in the RTI.Definitely, the project has attracted the people of the city at it is added into their list of hangout points. Several selfie points with enormous lighting and space certainly entice anybody in there. But it may be easy and soothing to one’s eyes but the adverse impact it holds is frightening. Project was estimated at Rs 1300 crores and was scheduled to end by the 2016. But it is still in progress.
Key features of Gomti Riverfront development project:
- The project aims at building concrete riverbanks of length 12 km stretching from Pucca pull to Shaheed path.
- There will be walking plazas, cycling and jogging tracks and ghats along the banks.
- It also aims at joining sharda canal with the river to maintain the water level in the times of crisis.
- River has been jacketed within 100-120 meters
Yamuna Riverfront Development
Though still on paper, Delhi government has plans ready for the Yamuna riverfront development project. Delhi government aims at improving the abysmal condition of river Yamuna that runs in miserable condition through Delhi. As estimated, it will take two years to develop a 5 km stretch of Yamuna with Rs 200 crores. As proposed, after development of stretch to beautify about a quarter of the river stretch it will have medicinal gardens, a biodiversity park and a modern wrestling ring.The river will also have canoeing and rowing facility. The stretch on the quarter length of the river in upstream of wazirabad will also sport cycle tracks and recreational activities. Bird watching and nature trails will also be facilitated. It will be a ‘concrete free’ riverfront development and to keep it ecological use of bamboo and wood will be made.
Key features of Yamuna Riverfront development:
- development of a 5 km stretch of Yamuna River with Rs 200 crores
- It will be a ‘concrete free’ riverfront development and to keep it ecological, use of bamboo and wood will be made.
- The developed river stretch will have medicinal gardens, a biodiversity park and a modern wrestling ring. Bird watching and nature trails will also be facilitated.
- The stretch on the quarter length of the river in upstream of wazirabad will also sport cycle tracks and recreational activities. The river will also have canoeing and rowing facility.
Hindon Riverfront Project
Alike other kins, Hindon riverfront also talks about restoring the Hindon river ecology and make it clean. The hindon riverfront project would stretch 22 km up to Greater Noida. A green corridor is proposed to be developed across 600 hectares Noida flood plains that will avail picnic spots to general public. In the first phase, about 200 acres will be acquired and converted into the riverfront area. The project involves developing facilities like parks, yoga centres, picnic spots and sports centres.
The proposed plan also entails eco-friendly cycle tracks, green belts and parks in green corridor. The project would also take care of the untreated sewerage falling in the river to rejuvenate it by sewage treatment plants.The projects DPR is still under preparation and is expected to complete by the mid of 2017.
Key features of Hindon Riverfront project:
- The hindon riverfront project would stretch 22 km up to Greater Noida.
- A green corridor is proposed to be developed across 600 hectares Noida flood plains that will avail picnic spots to general public. The project involves developing facilities like parks, yoga centres, picnic spots and sports centres.
- The proposed plan also entails eco-friendly cycle tracks, green belts and parks in green corridor.
- The project would also take care of the untreated sewerage falling in the river to rejuvenate it by sewage treatment plants.
Pune riverfront development
The two rivers Mula and Mutha that flow through the heart of Pune city have deteriorated beyond limit and Pune Municipal Corporation under the aegis of JNNURM (Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission) has planned a project along 44 km stretch of Mula and Mutha to envisage the channelizing of the river, introducing barrages to maintain water levels, development of riparian zone as entertainment and shopping groups, even Parking lots, introducing navigation in the river etc.
Project plan has several short comings and has been put to break before its start. The project does not say a word about treating water quality, but has plans to build drainage lines inside the riverbed and carry the sewage out of Pune city limits. This hardly qualifies as river rejuvenation or restoration. A case has been filed against this project in National Green Tribunal.
Key features of the Pune Riverfront development project:
- Riverfront development project along 44 km stretch of Mula and Mutha to envisage the channelizing of the river
- Introducing barrages to maintain water levels
- Development of riparian zone as entertainment and shopping groups, even Parking lots, introducing navigation in the river etc.
Brahmaputra Riverfront development
Assam government had inaugurated the Brahmaputra riverfront project in 2013 under Assam infrastructure financing authority. The 20 km stretch along river in the city will undergo revamp as a part of the project. While the plan talks of revitalization of the river ecology and Strengthening of riverbanks through soil bio engineering it has several urban features on its agenda like promenade, Ghats, Plazas and Parks; buildings, conference facilities, Parking lots, ferry terminals, Bus and para transport stops, Urban utilities and drainage, Improved infrastructure for floating restaurants, Public amenities; Dhobi Ghats, etc. The project will also restrict any construction within the 400 meters of the river. The Assam government plans to boost tourism in the state with this lavish project.
Assam government also wants to end criminal or nefarious activities along the river bank and reclaim the encroached land by them by this project.
But thing to notice is that while on one hand the city is struggling to cope up with the flood prone nature of the Brahmaputra River, State Government of Assam plans to take up an ambitious project to develop the city riverfront. On the request of GMDA (Guwahati metropolitan development authority), National Institute of Hydrology (NIH), Roorkee is carrying out a study which includes river shifting analysis for studying stability of the river banks, flow variations to determine the perennial water depth, estimate of floods of various return periods for design of river embankments, estimate of water surface profiles employing hydro-dynamic river flow model and design parameters for river embankments. The Brahmaputra Riverfront Development Project however has been inaugurated even before the requisite studies have been completed.
Key components of the project:
- Continuity and access along the river
- Linkages from the city to the riverfront
- Restructuring Land Use
- Development of cultural precinct in the Government areas
- Revitalization of the river ecology
- Strengthening of riverbanks through soil bio engineering
- Riverside Promenade, Ghats, Plazas and Parks
- Buildings for social infrastructure-museums, art gallery, conservatory, conference facilities and youth centre
- Local produce markets
- Lighting, Street Furniture & Public Art
- Heritage management & conservation
- Improved cross sections of roads with emphasis on pedestrian safety and NMV usage.
- Improved MV movement
- Parking facilities
- Ferry terminals
- Bus and para transport stops
- Urban utilities and drainage
- Improved infrastructure for floating restaurants
- Public amenities
- Riverfront management infrastructure
- Reorganization of cremation activity
- Dhobi ghats
- Development controls and norms
Godavari river development
The city of Nashik has been blessed with the passage of rivers Godavari and Darna. 18 km stretch along both banks of Godavari River need to be developed with amenities, Gardens and parking spaces, community facility so that essentially the area is useful in handling congestion in the Kumbhmela period as well as create places of relaxation for citizens of Nashik.
Earlier the Nashik Municipal Corporation (NMC) had tried to improve the riverfront small stretch by constructing small ghats, Jogging track and retaining walls at some stretches of the left bank of river about 3 km long under the Goda Park project.But it is felt that these efforts are not sufficient for the conservation of river front.
Godavari Riverfront Development at Nanded focuses on regeneration of the river. The North Bank will be integrated with the existing urban fabric while the less developed South Bank is proposed as an eco-park.
Key components of the 13.5 km long project:
- Ghats, walking paths and promenades with laser shows, musical fountains, rope-way, multi-purpose meeting hall, garden,
- water sports, canteen, etc.
- Buildings for social infrastructure
- Revival of natural drainage systems
- Revenue generation systems
- Parks, gardens, street planting and eco-systems
- Street furniture, art, sculptures
- Reorganizing cremation activity
- Solid waste management
The project has received funds from the National River Conservation Directorate as well as JNNURM.
On the other hand there are several court orders against Nashik Municipal Corporation pending about severe water pollution in the River including Ram Kund where holy dip on Kumbh Mela is supposed to be taken.
Looking the key features of riverfront projects and accessing their significance
After reading about the above listed riverfront development models in India it appears as they are false propaganda for the restoration and rejuvenation of the rivers. Every riverfront has common components of economic gain on the cost of river ecology.
Every riverfront development model speaks about the construction of pavements in the river bed and the flood plains. Reclaiming or 'encroaching' in coarse and ideal word, and then selling the land piece to builders for commercial activities to derive benefits.
Rivers are being jacketing and narrowed far within their actual width. Binding the river into narrowed concrete channels would affect its flow pattern that may can impact river's flooding capacity and its aquatic life. Concrete in the riverbed would cut off source of water in the river. Citing this as probable outcome, these projects intend to connect the rivers with the nearby rivers and canals so to avoid them from drying up. Similar thing happened when Sabarmati water dried up and it was transferred and stored from Narmada main canal. Gomti is also proposed at connecting with Sharda canal so to avoid such times.
Every riverfront development model aims at glorifying 'selfie point' concept to attract crowd and give them space for their leisure times. But far away from truth, they are unaware how adversely such constructions affect our ecology.
Main problem with river systems is their pollution. Instead of tapping the drains falling into rivers with sewage. Projects instead of fixing this problem in first phase of the project are preferring to develop the river pavements as they can start bringing through recreational activities. Such hefty projects become source of money for the politicians and tax payers' money is not utilized properly for other social purposes.
What are we aiming at:
@ballotboxindia through its rigorous research keeps track of riverfront developments going across the country. It aims at accessing the impact of riverfront construction on the ecology and environment of the river. There is a wave of rising riverfront projects on Indian rivers. They are imitations of riverfront developments on river Thames, Hudson and many more alike in developed countries. As their rivers differ in nature and flow from ours, it is easy to build structures along their stretch than ours. Our rivers carry sediment load exponential times of them. And few countries have preferred use of bamboo and other eco-friendly elements for riverfront development instead of concrete and other anti-nature substances.
Moreover, as we read above, every riverfront project talks and elaborates about the constructions on river embankments and flood plains to promote commercial activities. Every project plans to jacket the river that would affect the flow and nature of the river. They are massive projects that require massive funding. It is the tax payers money that is used in these activities and its information is not disclosed to them. Governments find berths for earning money through these massive projects and they do very little to the rejuvenation of the river, which is the main reason behind such projects.
What are we looking for:
If you are someone with interests in water systems in India, and want to be a part of this initiative. Please click "Connect" button on this page, or write to firstname.lastname@example.org
If you have a few hours to work in your community for common good, let us know and join as a coordinator.
If you have some time, skill and aptitude to make a difference ballotboxindia.com is the right platform. Get in touch with your details.
User Tip: Click for a full screen editor, To insert an image.