Direct Losses: Data Collection, Reporting, and Agency and Organizational Roles
One step toward producing more complete loss estimates would be to assign one agency of the federal government to compile a comprehensive data base identifying the direct costs of natural disasters, as well as the individuals and groups who bear these costs. These data should be collected according to the framework described in Chapter 2, for each natural disaster exceeding a given dollar loss threshold. The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis appears to have the capabilities to compile such a data base, with considerable input and assistance from FEMA and other relevant federal agencies. Whatever agency is selected should be given sufficient resources to accomplish this assignment.
The recommended loss estimate data base would be compiled from many sources, including organizations such as Property Claims Services and the Institute for Business and Home Safety (which compile data on paid insurance claims) and other federal, state, and local agencies. The assistance of relevant professional associations, such as the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, should be enlisted to obtain other relevant data. A synthesis report containing data on disaster losses should be published periodically, preferably annually. One way the federal government might make sure it receives at least the state and local data is by amending the Stafford Act, requiring the data to be submitted as a condition for future federal disaster aid.
A related recommendation is for the federal Office of Management and Budget, with advice from FEMA, to develop annual, comprehensive estimates of the payouts for the direct losses (due directly physical damage) made by federal agencies. These data should be divided into at least four categories:
- compensation payments to individuals and businesses (including subsidies on loans to help cover disaster-related expenses);
- response costs;
- losses to government-owned infrastructure (including state and local costs that are reimbursed by the federal government); and,
- payouts from federal disaster insurance programs (with annual premiums shown separately).
These data should be assembled for some historic period in order to provide information of trends of disaster losses and payouts. Such an effort is critical if the federal government and policymakers are to better plan for future disaster-related expenditures, including mitigation programs and activities.
The largest current gap in direct loss data involves uninsured losses borne by businesses and individuals. These data might be obtained through post-event sampling (in large disasters) and extrapolating these losses from other data
Sometimes the best response to natural or man-made disasters can be effective planning before tragedy strikes. An entire academic and practical body of learning and practice has evolved around what to do in a disaster and how to prepare for one. Many communities and institutions have disaster management plans in place for this purpose. Whether you are evaluating an existing plan and writing about it or giving a presentation to those interested in improving disaster management plans, your conclusion is important both in evaluating the plan's current effectiveness and deciding how it should be changed.
1. Summarize the disaster management plan or practices being evaluated. Use bullet points to outline the main components of the management plan or describe its salient points in concise paragraphs.
2. Follow the summary with an assessment of the current plan's strengths. Though an evaluation of current plans should outline its failings, identifying the processes that do work can be beneficial to future preparations.
3. Establish the plan's weaknesses. Write honestly about the failings of the disaster management plan in question. Avoid sugar-coating the plan's disadvantages; sober analysis during this stage can lead to significant improvements in future management plans.
4. Recommend new plans or improvements to existing ones. One of the main purposes of any disaster management analysis is brainstorming and implementing new ideas or improving existing processes. End your conclusion by turning your eye to the future of your disaster management plan, including recommendations for more funding, encouraging a complete overhaul of the system or pinpointing additions or subtractions to the plan itself.
About the Author
Michael Batton Kaput began writing professionally in 2009. He is an editor at two magazines and a freelance writer. He has been published in "Egypt Today," Egypt's leading current affairs magazine, and "Business Today Egypt," Egypt's number one English-language business magazine. He attended Denison University where he earned a degree in political science and English literature.
- Jupiterimages/Photos.com/Getty Images
Suggest an Article Correction